Jurors in the federal bomb-making trial of David Guy McKay told the judge they were deadlocked Friday afternoon, but he sent them back to the jury room to deliberate more.
They did so until 5 p.m. then went home. Deliberations resume at 8:30 a.m. Monday.
Although the courtroom theatrics had ended with final arguments the day before, there were flurries of activity during Friday's deliberations as the jury of eight women and four men sent out at least four notes.
Two notes hinted at a concern of at least some of the jurors: whether a federal informant had "induced or persuaded" McKay to manufacture eight Molotov cocktails during last summer's Republican National Convention in St. Paul.
McKay, 23, of Austin and a friend, Bradley Neil Crowder, also 23 and of Austin, were charged with making and possessing the Molotov cocktails.
Crowder this month entered a guilty plea to one of the three counts he faced, and the government dropped the other two. He faces 30 to 46 months in prison. No sentencing date has been set.
McKay, however, took his case to trial and said the FBI informant in the case, Brandon Darby of Austin, entrapped him.
Darby, who gained a national reputation in activist circles for his relief work in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, became a government informant and infiltrated a group of Austin activists at the request of the FBI.
Both men testified at the trial. Darby said he didn't induce McKay or Crowder to make the Molotov cocktails, and he denied planting the idea in their heads. McKay said Darby hatched the plan to make the firebombs.
Before deliberations began, Chief U.S. District Judge Michael Davis told the jury that if they concluded McKay had no "intent or disposition" to break the law prior to meeting Darby, and if the informant "induced and persuaded" McKay to build the firebombs, then it was entrapment and they should acquit McKay.
Jurors deliberated for two hours Thursday and resumed at 8:30 a.m. Friday. Three hours later, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Paulsen and defense attorney Jeffrey DeGree were summoned to the courtroom because the jury sent a question to the judge.
Davis read the note aloud in court. Jurors wanted to know the difference between "induced" and "persuaded," and they wanted to know if the "mere suggestion" of making a Molotov cocktail could be considered inducement or persuasion.
In his reply, the judge gave jurors the dictionary definitions of the two words and told them they'd have to figure it out on their own.
Paulsen declined to comment. DeGree said that while he wouldn't speculate on how jurors were voting, "I was pleased to see ... that they are looking at the right issues."
Shortly after 2 p.m., another note: "We cannot reach a unanimous decision."
The judge brought jurors into the courtroom and read them additional instructions, known as an "Allen charge" or a "dynamite charge."
The instruction reaffirms that jurors "must not surrender your honest convictions," but it also tells them to "carefully reconsider all the evidence bearing upon the question before you."
It also tells them there's no reason to think another trial would be better or have "a more conscientious, impartial or competent jury."
The charge is prohibited in some federal jurisdictions; critics say the instructions can be interpreted as pressuring jurors in the minority to rethink their positions.
About 4:15 p.m. jurors had sent two notes — one asking to be sent home at 5 p.m., and the other declaring that one of the jurors was concerned his continued absence might cost him his job. Davis said he would call the man's employer because it is illegal to fire a person for missing work while on a jury.
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/n ... lotov.html

